New Approaches for Phylogenetic Species Tree Estimation
summary
Three concrete claims: quartet theory gives statistically consistent species-tree inference under ILS/GDL/HGT and is implemented in ASTRAL/ASTRAL‑Pro which beats concatenation on high discordance; a divide‑and‑conquer pipeline lets maximum‑likelihood tools (RAxML/IQ‑TREE) scale from thousands to tens of thousands of taxa, replacing multi‑hundred‑CPU‑year concatenation runs with minutes to hours; and co‑estimation (BAli‑phy) wins on simulated alignments but fails on structural benchmarks, posing a real alignment model vs benchmark conundrum.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (23)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:54Phylogenomic pipeline
- 1:411KP: Thousand Transcriptome Project
- 2:14Avian Phylogenomics Project
- 3:30Large datasets are difficult
- 4:22This talk 1. Estimating species trees from gene trees ("easy")
- 5:29Phylogeny Estimation
- 6:16Gene tree discordance
- 7:41Traditional approach: concatenation
- 8:30Summary Method Protocol
- 13:14Summary and two key ideas for ILS-based species tree estimation
- 13:50Gene Family Trees
- 14:19Species tree estimation under GDL
- 18:17What about HGT?
- 19:08Gene trees - Species trees, using Quartet Trees
- 19:36Part II: Large-scale gene tree estimation
- 20:05DNA Sequence Evolution (Idealized)
- 20:50Maximum likelihood for gene tree estimation
- 22:59Part III: Multiple Sequence Alignment
- 23:12Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA): a scientific grand challenge!
- 24:46Simulation Studies
- 27:11Statistical Alignment
- 28:51What is going on? Most likely not an issue of failure of the MCMC analyses to converge (48 hours, 32 processors, 30 sequences).
