Law as Science, Science as Law
summary
Argues that law adopts measurement and AI tools, citing Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s substitution of quantitative for qualitative judgments and Ironclad’s concrete result that shifting to a standard indemnification clause conversion rate increased by 5%. Notes generative AI excels on semi‑structured text with expanding context windows and proposes a Moore’s‑law‑style efficiency where a firm earning $8.8B with 3,828 attorneys could need 3.8 attorneys if output per lawyer scales dramatically.
AI-written summary · about
related talks
46mAI for Legal : The story of hype, adoption and what comes next
17mAI Law & Ethics: developing responsible AI systems
49mCode as Law
29mGenerative-AI: Usecase-Specific Evaluation of LLM-powered Applications
49mKeeping Up with the Algorithms: A Journey in Artificial Intelligence
48mPJ Hagerty: AI and Ethics - What We SHOULD Be Pondering
01h 11mAlgorithm Design and Law: Potential and Challenges
53mSome Implications for the use of Gen AI in courts