Replication: No One Can Hack My Mind Revisiting a Study on Expert and Non-Expert
summary
Replication of a 2015 survey reproduces the original’s main findings but with precise differences: 288 MTurk non-experts and 75 experts (mostly EU) replace the original samples, and an A/B test splits the original compound effectiveness/realism question. Results show unchanged non-expert self-reports, a persistent expert–nonexpert gap, one new common advice (script/ad blockers and VPN mentions) and four concrete problem areas—passwords, password managers, 2FA, and updates—where experts rate advice effective but not realistic.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:24What the Study is About
- 1:52Original Study: Results
- 2:30Methodology Improvement
- 3:37Non-Expert Recruitment & Demographics
- 6:12Results: Top Three Security Advice
- 7:42Results: Good and Effective Advice
- 8:49Results: Fields of Action
- 12:19Limitations
- 14:03Conclusion
- 15:23Thank you! Any questions?
related talks
13mReplication: “No one can hack my mind” - 10 years later: An update and outlook on...
05mReplication: On the Ecological Validity of Online Security Developer Studies
09mReplication: Stories as Informal Lessons about Security
05mKnowledge and Capabilities that Non-Expert Users Bring to Phishing Detection
06mReplication: Why We Still Can't Browse in Peace On the Uniqueness and Reidentifiability
12m"I don’t know why I check this...'' Investigating Expert Users' Strategies to Detect...
26mStudying the Impact of Managers on Password Strength and Reuse
18mStack Overflow Meets Replication: Security Research Amid Evolving...