Entrevistamos a Vicenç García Altés
summary
Interview answers which companies benefit from Serverless and which do not with concrete tradeoffs and real failures and wins. Claims include faster prototyping and lower ops for spiky workloads and small teams, but worse results for sustained high throughput where per-invocation pricing becomes expensive. Technical cons spelled out include cold starts, harder local testing and debugging, and increased risk of vendor lock-in. Examples show reduced time to market for event-driven services and broken SLAs when latency and observability are underestimated.
AI-written summary · about
related talks
01mVicenç García-Altés at Barcelona Software Craftsmanship'17
01mEntrevista a Ricardo Borillo
07mCommunity interview
35mServerless Experiences -- On Your Own Servers?
09mServerless as a Competitive Advantage for Your Business
04mWhat if serverless was real?
01h 00mMicroservices and Serverless
01h 00mServerless - reality or BS - notes from the trenches