Bayesian Inference for Fun and Profit
summary
Worked examples use Major League baseball (first 45 at‑bats) and Women's World Cup match data (48 matches) to compare full Bayesian posteriors against MLE/point estimates. Estimates come from Stan using CmdStan/commandstanpy workflows; the hierarchical model gives league mean ~0.27 and shrinks Roberto Clemente’s 0.400 to ~0.32, but requires raising adapt_delta to avoid divergences. Soccer model uses SPI priors and posterior predictive checks to show very wide credible intervals and that uncertainty, not just point estimates, changes decisions.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Bayesian inference with Stan
- 1:05Hamiltonian Monte Carlo explained
- 7:10Multi-level regression models
- 23:47Baseball batting case study
- 34:07Running Stan with cmdStanPy
- 47:51Women's World Cup model
- 1:08:15Evaluating Bayesian models
- 1:15:30Q&A
related talks
01h 27mProbabilistic Python: An Introduction to Bayesian Modeling with PyMC
56mSports Analytics: Big Data in the Big Time
42mBayesDB: Query the Probable Implications of Data
25mScaling Bayesian Experimentation
01h 24mBayesianism and Survival Analysis
39mThe Duct Tape of Heroes: Bayes Rule
34mFast, beautiful and easy Bayesian modelling: Can you have it all?
42mThe Duct Tape of Heroes Bayesian statistics
