CA-CI: A Normative Framework for Evaluating Privacy and Dignity in AI Governance
summary
CA-CI claims two concrete moves: add purpose as a sixth parameter to Contextual Integrity and use Nussbaum’s 10 capabilities as minimum dignity thresholds. The framework flags Fudinho’s undisclosed location and audio/text monitoring and its secret “excellence” worker score as GDPR Article 13 violations that degrade practical reasoning and control over one’s environment. It maps to DPIAs, risk registers, and approval workflows and links to an open‑access paper with application steps and enforcement examples.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00CA-CI framework intro
- 1:57Contextual integrity in AI
- 4:05Purpose in integrity analysis
- 5:08Dignity as privacy standard
- 7:16Capabilities approach extension
- 8:20Fudinho data privacy case
- 12:01Risk prevention with framework
- 15:57CA-CI future work
related talks
01h 14mSenior Academic Session I.
01h 17mASSESSING THE IMPACT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN AI APPLICATIONS
06mEthics, Between AI and Free Software
01h 15mCALIBRATING THE AI ACT - IS IT THE RIGHT FRAMING TO PROTECT PERSONAL AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT
01h 19mAligning Data Privacy and AI Governance
29mDPIA in practice typical hurdles and remedies
01h 06mEMPOWERING THE AI ACT: LIMITS AND OPPORTUNITIES
11mHow Does AI Change Privacy? Towards Helping Practitioners Scope, Motivate, and Conduct