DPIA in practice typical hurdles and remedies
summary
Explains that a privacy threshold assessment must precede a DPIA and should focus on severity not likelihood, using the EDPB two-of-nine test as guidance but noting it can misweight scale versus sensitivity (a million IPs may hit more criteria than 50 genetic records despite lower per-subject harm). Compares methods: German SDM (comprehensive), CNIL Kneel tool (practical but omits PTA and some security goals) and ISO 29134; describes combining Kneel, SDM and ISO elements into a scalable DataGuard workflow.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Intro
- 1:40Privacy Threshold Assessment
- 5:18Criteria
- 8:22Challenges
- 13:15Methods
- 19:00Data Guard
- 19:50Common obstacles
- 22:40Questions
related talks
01h 15mTowards agreed practices for privacy impact assessments
49mNew Way of Tackling Privacy Assessments
26mAssessing Risks: Perspectives on the Data Protection Impact
01h 15mDATA PROTECTION ENGINEERING: WHAT IS THE ROAD AHEAD?
02m"3 Questions to"
01h 16mSecurity meets data protection: risk assessment, standards and certification
01h 14mSenior Academic Session I
01h 11mTransforming GDPR into a Risk Based Harm Tool Alongside Specific AI Regulation...