3 questions to – Frederick Richter
summary
GDPR’s impact depends on how data protection authorities enforce and interpret it — strict supervision produces bureaucracy, pragmatic application produces room for a European data economy; the law already builds harmonization through the coherence mechanism and the one-stop shop via the European Data Protection Board; Germany can apply those EU instruments to align federal structures; the conference goes virtual and free, increasing reach during the pandemic.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (4)
- 0:00Start
- 0:07Do you consider data protection as an enable or as a hurdle for innovation?
- 1:10Can you name three aspects that would improve harmonization of the COPR interpretation in the EU?
- 2:06What do you think of our very first virtual Privacy Conference this year
related talks
27mEnforcing Data Protection in Germany and Europe
05mInterview with Ulrich Kelber
30mPanel: Do We Need a Global Approach to Data Protection?
01h 10mThe data protection reform: Where are we and where are we going?
01h 15mAcademic Session I The GDPR within a continuously reforming digital environment
25mRegulator Responses to Current Data Protection Questions
01h 07mThe GDPR and the broader EU Digital Rulebook
01h 13mThe data protection reform: The reform in perspective.