GDPR Art 15: An Update on Recent Developments, Trends and Experiences
summary
Argues that Art 15’s “copy” is best read as copy means a photocopy, forcing controllers to produce full email records rather than summaries; recommends documented SOPs for searching systems and assessing scope; treats Art 12(5) excessive requests narrowly but cites a Heidelberg case €100,000 effort for nine‑year email reviews as the type of proof needed to refuse or charge; lists exemptions (Art 15/14 trade secrets, §29 BDSG secrecy) and expects use AI redaction tools to scale responses.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction
- 2:06Examples
- 3:19Access Right
- 7:49Access Request Scope
- 9:39Excessive Request
- 17:14Other Exceptions
related talks
40mGDPR in Practice – What's Hot, What's Not
01h 18mArchives and Data Protection
01h 13mLaw Enforcement Directive – Unpacking GDPR’s Little Brother
26mData Protection Update and Tales from the Introduction of the GDPR
01h 13mRights of access to corporate documentations and the trade secrets defence
56mPractical privacy - GDPR explained
49mPractical privacy: GDPR explained
01h 00mPrivacy and GDPR: What all developers should know