Interview with Ulrich Kelber
summary
Says GDPR is a gold standard for data protection that is largely future‑proof but still needs targeted adaptations for new technologies; argues for data free flow with trust between democratic liberal countries and a practical path to regulatory convergence plus international certification to make compliance simpler for providers. Calls for regulators to use three‑year foresight to issue recommendations, for privacy‑by‑design and security‑by‑design in human‑centered systems, and praises the third Privacy Symposium mix of DPAs, scientists, civil society and industry.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction
- 0:39From your point of view, what will be the main challenges with data regulation in the years to come?
- 1:29What could be the added value of an international data protection certification mechanism?
- 2:37Do you think that conferences like the Privacy Symposium contribute to international dicussion and cooperation?
- 3:14What is your vision and hopes for the year to come?
- 4:13Is there any message you would like to share?
related talks
30mPanel: Do We Need a Global Approach to Data Protection?
05mInterview with John Edwards
17mKeynote
03m3 questions to – Frederick Richter
32mPanel: How can Data Protection become a driver for the Data Economy
10mImpulse: Do We Need a Global Approach to Data Protection?
22mPanel Discussion – 17 months of GDPR experience – Should we review?
06mInterview with Barbara Cosgrove