Algorithms for Combinatorial Problems Arising in the Analysis of Cancer Mutation Networks
summary
Presents concrete algorithms: NOMAS color-coding adapts color-coding to maximize a non‑additive log‑rank survival score and uses permutations on gene labels to assess significance; it finds an 8‑gene GBM subnetwork (263 TCGA samples) mixing PI3K‑AKT and p53/RB genes that is not significant by single‑gene tests. Also formulates the ILP for connected maximum coverage (K genes cover max patients), compares it to greedy/approximation methods, reports fast ILP solves on TCGA graphs and differing biological hits depending on solver and permutation test.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (21)
- 0:00Start
- 0:26Cancer Genomes
- 1:05Single Gene Test
- 1:43Mutations and Pathways
- 1:54Finding Cancer Pathways
- 2:50Cancer Mutations and Large Networks: Algorithms
- 3:59(Local) Topology Matters
- 4:40Influence Graph
- 5:19Finding Subnetworks Associated with Survival
- 6:41Log-rank Test
- 8:10Computational Problem
- 8:45NOMAS (Network of Mutations Associated with Survival)
- 9:41Color-Coding Alon, Yuster, Zwick. STOC 1994
- 15:40NOMAS and Color Coding
- 17:13NOMAS vs Other Approaches
- 19:34Discovering Significant Subnetworks
- 20:48Combinatorial Model
- 21:55Connected maximum coverage problem
- 23:45ILP for maximum connected coverage
- 24:47Comparison with other methods
- 26:30Acknowledgements
