The Limits of Reputation in Platform Markets
summary
Uses eBay internal data on 935,000 new buyers tracked ~3 years (15M purchases, 1.8M sellers) to show that traditional percent-positive scores are biased by silent buyers and retaliation; defines effective percent positive (positives ÷ total transactions) and finds sellers in the top EPP quartile raise buyer return-to-eBay probability by about 4% and return-to-seller by ~2%. Natural-language signals from post-sale messages (the negative message rate) predict dissatisfaction as strongly as EPP. A randomized search demotion experiment (10% traffic, ~3pp EPP shift) changes outcomes without lowering short-run conversion.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (14)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:42Platform Markets and Quality Control
- 3:53Contributions
- 10:12Conceptual Framework
- 12:43What do buyers use to form expectations? Reputation! After every eBay transaction
- 20:46Feedback is Biased
- 23:19Effective Percent Positive (EPP) EPP
- 24:27EPP Distribution
- 27:37The Distribution of Buyer Purchases
- 28:28The Scope for Externalities is real
- 28:59The Main Regression: "Loyalty. (Voice) and Exit"
- 31:29Main Regression Results: Ever Return
- 38:51Measuring Treatment Effect: Discounted Search EPP
- 43:31Concluding Remarks
related talks
20mBoomerang: Rebounding the Consequences of Reputation Feedback on Crowdsourcing Platforms
33mPredictive NPS (PNPS)
29mClearing Matching Markets Efficiently: Informative Signals and Match Recommendations
52mDashboard Mechanisms for Online Marketplaces
44mClearing Matching Markets Efficiently: Informative signals and Match Recommendations
50mQuality Selection in Two-Sided Markets: A Price Discrimination Approach
49mFrom research to production at ebay
50mDiversity in Matching Markets
