When Software Starts Thinking: The Now of Quality Engineering
summary
Generative AI breaks the “same input, same output” rule, so quality work shifts into measurable AI Assurance: map each trust attribute to risks, pick metrics, run tests and record evidence (RMTE). The talk gives concrete numbers — 170+ metrics catalogued, a sample threshold of ≤5% hallucination and a composite release gate of >95% trust score — and shows RAG checks (citation sufficiency and citation accuracy), agent tool‑selection validation, and an audit trail that packages test results as evidence for production decisions.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (50)
- 0:00Start
- 0:04Session Opens - When Software Starts Thinking
- 0:35Generative AI Broke the Rule: Same Input, Same Output
- 1:06Speaker Intro - Chinmaya Kothari, Director of QE and AI COE, QualiZeal
- 2:08The Opening Example: "Will This Contract Clause Hold Up?"
- 2:38Same Question, Same System, Opposite Answers
- 3:08The Deterministic World: Printing the Same Paragraph Every Time
- 4:12How We Tested in That World - Any Change Was a Defect
- 4:43The Translator Example: Same Paragraph, Three Different Translations
- 5:44Interpretation Enters, and the Whole Testing Paradigm Changes
- 6:15The Generative AI Example: "Delivery Within 30 Days"
- 6:46Words Added, Meaning Changed - That's Hallucination
- 7:18Confidence Does Not Mean Correctness
- 7:48The Agentic Example: "Ship This Assignment by Friday"
- 8:19Message Drift as a Distinct Failure Mode
- 8:50Bias, Inaccuracy, Safety, PII and PHI Exposure
- 9:21The Tester's Role Changes: From Correct to Trustable
- 9:51The Paradigm Shift From Pass/Fail to Overall Trust
- 10:21The Trust Attributes You Have to Evaluate
- 10:51The NIST AI Risk Management Framework and Its Six Attributes
- 11:21If Even One Attribute Fails, the System Is Not Trustable
- 11:53The Four-Step Framework: Risk, Metric, Test, Evidence
- 12:23Step One - Risk: Where Can Each Trust Attribute Go Wrong?
- 12:54Citation Sufficiency as a RAG-Specific Reliability Risk
- 13:24Step Two - Metric: How Do You Measure Hallucination?
- 13:54170-Plus Metrics Defined So Far, and Still Growing
- 14:55AI Systems Hallucinate by Design - You Cannot Stop It
- 15:26Which Brings You to Thresholds
- 16:28Five Hallucinations in 100 Is Acceptable; Six Is Not
- 17:30One Risk, One Metric - Now Multiply It Across Everything
- 18:00Step Four - Test: Actually Measuring the Metric
- 19:00Packaging Everything as Evidence and an Audit Trail
- 19:30The Trap: One Passing Trust Attribute Is Not a Passing System
- 20:31Is 100% Trustable a Fair Requirement?
- 21:32A Composite Trust Score Above 95% as the Release Gate
- 22:03What Changed: We Used to Do Proofreading, Now We Fact-Check
- 23:37Why Citation Becomes the Key RAG Metric
- 24:39Citation Sufficiency and Citation Accuracy
- 25:40Recapping RMTE: Risk, Metric, Test, Evidence
- 26:43Back to the Contract Clause - That Wasn't a Bug
- 27:13An LLM Hardly Ever Says "I Don't Know"
- 28:17Too Much Creativity and Translation Becomes Fiction
- 30:37Q&A: Validating an Agent's Tool Selection Before Production
- 32:08Q&A: How Much Human Intervention Before an AI Test Can Be Trusted
- 33:41Internal Chatbot vs Customer-Facing - Very Different Bars
- 34:13Q&A: What Will Have Changed Most by Next Year?
- 35:15Q&A: Testing an Agent's Decision Process, Not Just Its Answer
- 36:47Only When Every Layer Is Trustable Is the System Trustable
- 37:17Q&A: Are Confidence and Correctness Together the Best Combination?
- 38:18Why Their Framework Lets You Weight Each Trust Attribute
related talks
32mKeynote: AI & GenAI in Quality Engineering: Crawl, Walk, Run
28mWhy Software Quality Is the Key to Scaling AI Development
52mNavigating Software Quality - From Chaos to Control
01h 05mPanel Discussion: Building Confidence in AI-Driven Testing Decisions
47mHuman Experience Testing – Redefining Quality Engineering in the Age of AI
32mQuality engineering in the AI age: From testing AI to leveraging GenAI
22mBeyond Bugs: How AI turns QA into Full-Circle Engineers
01h 05mPanel Discussion - The Future of Testing: Impact of AI in Quality Assurance and Beyond
