Sum of Squares SDP Relaxations on Random Tensors
summary
Proves a concrete runtime vs. guarantee tradeoff: a degree-d Sum-of-Squares proof (computed in time n^{O(d)}) certifies strictly better upper bounds on the injective norm of random k‑tensors than the naive spectral bound, interpolating between polynomial time (certify O(n)) and brute force (certify O(√n)) as d grows. Construction uses a symmetrized tensor spectral matrix and the trace method to bound its norm, yields subexponential refutations for random k‑LIN, and matches known SOS lower bounds up to logs.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Introduction to CSPs
- 3:08Planting and hardness
- 7:17Sum of squares results
- 12:28Injective tensor norms
- 17:24Spectral symmetrization
- 25:18Trace method for bounds
- 36:15Open problems and closing
related talks
42mTight Semidefinite Programming Relaxations for Polynomial Optimization
39mFast Spectral Algorithms from Sum-of-Squares Analyses
01h 01mLP/SDP Hierarchies and Sum of Squares Proofs 1
01h 06mLP/SDP Hierarchies and Sum of Squares Proofs 4
01h 12mPedagogical Talk: Frameworks for Information-Computation Tradeoffs
29mSum Of Squares Lower Bounds Versus Low-Degree Polynomial Lower Bounds
59mLP/SDP Hierarchies and Sum of Squares Proofs 3
31mA Positivity-First Approach to Sum-of-Squares Over the Hypercube
