Privacy Practices on Trial
summary
Argues that companies must build open communication with DPAs and hire outside counsel to survive regulatory scrutiny, citing use of Alan Noy in Luxembourg as the chosen advisor and a multiyear engagement horizon of one to five years. Notes the legal maze of the directive as implemented in 27 member states, describes commissioning a Europe-wide consultancy and the launch of a three-month consultation in the UK, and warns that complexity and changing technology make compliance harder not easier.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (4)
related talks
01h 16mThe role and power of DPAS - Between CJEU and GDPR.
01h 14mRegulatory choices and privacy consequences
43mPanel: Cooperation For a Functioning Data Protection Framework
01h 15mOVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT: TAKING STOCK OF DESIGN CHOICES AND TRADE-OFFS
22mPanel Discussion – 17 months of GDPR experience – Should we review?
01h 20mEnforcing EU's Digital Regulations in Court - How Can Civil Society Step in?
05m3 questions to – Dr Frank Schemmel
01h 13mThe data protection reform: The reform in perspective.