~/talk

Where GenAI projects fail & how can leaders prevent it

name:Ruben H.
links:none on file
links:none on file
links:none on file
slides:none on file

Claims that 80–85% fail rate for AI projects comes from mismatched goals and weak data not model limits, with pilots often built in the cloud for two to three weeks but never integrated on prem; common pitfalls are RAG overused retrieval setups, poor integration with CRMs/SharePoint, and missing business-owner KPIs. Practical fixes include Watsonx-style stacks (AI, data, governance), keep prototypes model-agnostic, require domain + AI + IT + UX teams, and treat 95% of automation as classical code while reserving GenAI for the 4–5% that truly needs it.

AI-written summary · about

  1. 0:00GenAI project failures intro
  2. 1:51Why AI projects fail
  3. 6:09IBM’s GenAI failure prevention
  4. 8:57Clex AI business focus
  5. 11:07GenAI expectation management
  6. 13:54GenAI architecture challenges
  7. 16:24GenAI org & data challenges
  8. 23:50GenAI success criteria
  9. 33:02GenAI UX & data science
  10. 35:55GenAI community wishes
  11. 41:11GenAI team skills
  12. 46:23Q&A
~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.