The DSA as a tool in the fight against gender based violence
summary
The panel shows the DSA producing first risk assessment reports in November but hitting structural limits: a 45 million user threshold excludes many harmful platforms, public-dissemination rules sideline private messaging, and the AI Act only adds transparency not bans for deepfake porn. Concrete shifts include Pornhub plans consent verification by June after a 2020 purge of roughly 10 million videos and 2023 prosecutions; enforcement gaps, fragmented authorities, and slow judicial forensics keep victims without timely redress.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00DSA and gender violence panel intro
- 5:39Structural challenges of DSA
- 14:18DSA enforcement and regulations
- 21:00Porn platforms: gender violence measures
- 28:11Pakistan: digital gender violence
- 40:10DSA weaponization risks
- 54:06Q&A: victim support and law
- 1:07:34Q&A: digital evidence and algorithms
related talks
01h 14mBeyond ‘Solidarity with #TaylorSwift’ Checking Progress in the Fight Against Gender...
01h 16mWILL THE DIGITAL SERVICES ACT PROMOTE SAFER AND HEALTHIER ALGORITHMIC RANKINGS?
01h 18mThe Role of Research and Researchers in AI Governance
22mAI & Democracy
01h 16mGovernance of Deepfakes: Intersectional Harms
01h 18mApproaches to DSA Data Access
01h 08mCyberviolence, Vulnerability, and the Challenges of AI
01h 16mEnforcing Digital Regulation in Times of Omnibus