Governance and Security Concerns
summary
Describes on‑chain Tezos governance with concrete numbers and lessons: a production network with 500 bakers and roughly a $800M market cap, one real upgrade vote that achieves high turnout, and a working delegation system — delegation worked for a non‑contentious decision. Straw polls and off‑chain lightweight forums fail to represent voters. Recommends modular rules: different voting thresholds and time windows by change type, legal and security reviews, fast‑track fixes, and explicit quorum controls for large stakeholders.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Blockchain governance challenges
- 2:26Tezos governance model
- 7:01Security vs stakeholder conflicts
- 13:23Decentralization vs formal governance
- 18:14Social contracts vs enforcement
- 20:40Q&A
related talks
41mSecurely Scaling Decentralized Governance
23mSecurely Scaling Decentralized Governance
22mGrowing & Securing Networks What’s Next for Onchain Governance
26mFireside Chat
41mTezos, decentralized cryptographic governance through self-amendments
16mSmart Contract Governance
26mA formal security analysis of Blockchain voting
20mDiscussion - Security, Session 8
