Enhancing Statistical Rigor In Genomic Data Science
summary
Argues that ill‑posed p‑values arise from three concrete failures (treating two‑sample problems as one‑sample, poor parametric fits, and treating inferred covariates as observed) and offers practical fixes: a knockoff‑inspired FDR wrapper CLIPper that rescues MACS/HOMER/DESeq2/edgeR outputs and empirically brings actual FDR to target with modest power loss; a subsample+permute calibrator PseudotimeDE (80% subsamples, permutation nulls; ~1,000 rounds for 0.001 resolution) for single‑cell pseudotime; and a simulator SADesign3 using Gaussian/Vine copulas and GAM backbones that models correlations, outputs reads, handles continuous trajectories, spatial/ATAC/protein data, and generates realistic nulls.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (14)
- 0:00Start
- 0:50My first encounter of genomics bioinformatics (2007) Volume 447 Issue 7146, 14 June 2007
- 3:44Statistical rigor in multiple testing
- 4:47Formulation of a two-sample test as a one-sample test
- 9:09Specification of a parametric model that does not fit data well
- 24:04Halftime summary
- 24:28Clipper: p-value-free FDR control for genomics feature screening
- 26:46Clipper rectifies FDR control
- 27:35The last piece
- 29:04scDesign3: an omnibus single-cell & spatial omics simulator
- 30:44ClusterDE: scDesign3 for null data generation (preliminary)
- 31:04ClusterDE: Clipper + scDesign3 (preliminary)
- 33:37Summary: relevant publications
- 35:27Acknowledgements
