Industry Responses to the European Directive on Security of Network and Information
summary
30 UK interviews map how Operational Technology security lacks shared norms and shows inconsistent expertise, arguing NIS risks becoming a tick box. The paper identifies four security tropes (air gapping equals safety, innovation is inevitable, one-size-fits-all solutions, awareness suffices), classifies industry responses into four policy practices (compliance, workarounds, going beyond, negotiation), notes the profession needs recognized qualifications, and offers five policy recommendations to close the skills and evidence gap.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (4)
related talks
11mExploring the Security Culture of Operational Technology (OT) Organisations...
15mSecuring IoT: Why Tech Isn't Enough (An NCSC Perspective)
47mField Guide to Building an Operational Technology Cybersecurity Capability
01h 12mCYBERSECURITY FOR EUROPE: FOSTERING RIGHTS THROUGH TECHNOLOGY
21mFrom Wild West to Secure Business: Understanding Data and Standards in OT
27m4 Panel Session - Bridging Policy and Practice
41mIndustrialising Cyber Defence in an Asymmetric World
01h 12mSecuring cyber critical infrastructure.