Strip-searching the internet - upload filters and generalised monitoring ...
summary
European proposals push Article 13 upload filters that must scan everything uploaded, creating a general surveillance system that conflicts with the e‑commerce directive and GDPR, risks widespread over‑blocking and shifts costly compliance to small platforms. One industry example is YouTube's $60M Content ID system as a proof‑of‑concept that scales only for large companies. Policymakers run consultations, polls and a high‑level expert group, while alternatives like fast‑track judicial units or targeted notice-and-takedown remain talked about but under‑resourced.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (16)
- 0:00Introduction
- 4:22Digital Charter
- 7:20Fake news
- 16:10Global content removal
- 20:31British Telecom filter mechanism
- 24:27Fake news definition
- 26:54How to contribute
- 28:34Different conceptions of hate speech
- 37:05Homosexuality
- 39:06Content filters
- 41:52Flagging mechanisms
- 43:46Copyright territoriality
- 48:21Legal standards
- 51:08Impact on SMEs
- 53:40Solutions
- 57:14Copyright filters
related talks
01h 13mWe need to talk about filters: algorithmic copyright enforcement vs data protection.
02mQuestion and answer session
01h 14m'We give up -please fix the interwebz'. ...
37mEurope's Digital Future
01h 16mEnforcing the EU’s Digital Laws Delivering European Tech Policies that serve People...
01h 14mLessons from the GDPR Red Lines or Red Tape
01h 11mPrivacy and Net neutrality: Mutually Reinforcing?
01h 12mCOLLATERAL DAMAGES OF ENFORCEMENT – DIGITAL SERVICES ACT, NETWORK ENFORCEMENT ACT, AND LOI AVIA