How to effectively create and review PRs
summary
Advocates keeping PRs as small, focused units—split a feature into endpoint + models, storage/database, and UI PRs so feedback stays short and refactors are limited. Use GitHub features: put a PR template in .github, link issues to auto-close, and embed before/after screenshots or a markdown table for design changes. Reviewers choose between request changes / comment / approve based on crashes, missing tests, or nonblocking questions; authors open draft PRs to self-review, tag designers when needed, and prefix trivial suggestions with "nit."
AI-written summary · about
chapters (5)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:28PR size importance
- 7:08PR description tips
- 13:06Reviewing pull requests
- 17:21Final thoughts
related talks
29mThe Art of Humanizing Pull Requests (PR’s)
21mContinuous Improvements of The Code Review Process
26mThe Art of Humanizing Pull Requests
30mEffective Pull Request Reviews
35mLearn how to review PRs like an expert
39mEffective Code Review
22mContinuous Improvements of The Code Review Process
17mGitHub Pull Requests for Everyone
