Compliance for AI and crypto security first
summary
Panelists argue UK fin‑prompts force firms to publish different disclosures so many projects need two websites and distinct white papers for UK versus EU offers, driving extra developers and costs. They report MiCA plus new RTS/ESMA guidance narrows market access, likely leaving a dozen dominant operators in a few years. Practical defenses shown are a self‑custody model to avoid custody licensing, choosing a permissive hub (Malta/Dubai) and keeping marketing conservative to avoid regulatory scrutiny.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Welcome
- 2:31Crypto security challenges
- 6:29Global regulatory complexity
- 10:03Regulatory exposure for startups
- 13:34Jurisdictions and compliance strategies
- 16:44Predicting crypto regulatory shifts
- 20:02AI and crypto compliance debate
related talks
30mHow will MiCA regulation shape the future of crypto compliance?
07mCan Crypto Earn Trust in a Regulated Future?
28mThe Balance Between Innovation & Regulation
14mPlaying Catch-up: Regulating the Cryptocurrency Industry
31mThe Influence of Crypto Regulation on Open Blockchains: Opportunities and Challenges
54mAML Regulations and Financial Freedom
38mWhat are the key regulatory challenges for AI and blockchain today?
22mGuide to AML, Compliance & Global Regulation For Businesses & Enterprises