Protecting the Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Civil Liberties
summary
A proposed U.N. cybercrime treaty aims to replace the Budapest Convention and adds sweeping provisions that would force disclosure of financial and identity data, broaden AML rules to “any organization engaged in activities related to digital financial assets,” and weaken dual criminality protections; negotiators remove problematic clauses like Article 93 but leave Article 31’s broad seizure language. Examples include mass surveillance mandates, criminalizing use of anonymity tools in some drafts, and actual harms already seen where payment metadata and private messages are used as evidence after Dobbs.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Start
- 5:58Ongoing Threats to Privacy & Civil Liberties
- 6:39UN Cybercrime Convention
- 10:14UN: Article 93 - The Cryptocurrency Provision
- 16:44Key Context: Dual Criminality
- 25:40Questions?
related talks
01h 15mThe UN’s New Cybercrime Convention A Boon to Law Enforcement or a Danger to ..
49mThe Promise and Peril of a UN Cybercrime Treaty
01h 15mUS and Transatlantic Debates: Government And Law Enforcement Use Of Data.
01h 11mExchange with policy-makers - Government hacking for surveillance.
59mProtecting Civil Liberties With Privacy-Enhancing Technology
01h 09mBalancing Privacy, Security and Public Safety
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
01h 02mWeaponizing Technology: Examining the Importance of Privacy...