Comparing the Theory and Practice of Spectral Algorithms to Combinatorial Flow Algorithms for ...
summary
Compares spectral algorithms and combinatorial flow algorithms for graph partitioning and related cut problems, discussing their theoretical guarantees versus empirical behavior. Examines specific algorithms (spectral methods and flow-based combinatorial algorithms), the problem of finding low-conductance/low-cut partitions in graphs, and contrasts performance, approximation quality, and practical considerations.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (14)
- 0:00Intro
- 2:16A generalization: quantity normalized cut
- 3:29An intuitive clustering criterion
- 10:04Two terms expressions and the Rayleigh ratio (Lemma 3.1, [H13])
- 12:27The combinatorial versus the spectral continuous relaxations
- 19:42It works because the problem can be formulated as "monotone integer program" Theorem
- 27:18Scaling arcs weights
- 28:07The Simplified equivalent graph
- 28:57Solving the parametric min st cut
- 34:21Comparison between NC' and the spectral method
- 37:47Empirical testing for the general problems
- 39:18Scalability of NC' versus the spectral algorithm (Shi)
- 41:57A comparison of NC values of NC' with the sweep spectral algorithm
- 51:02Conclusions
related talks
29mSampling Algorithms for Combinatorial Pure Exploration
12mToward Nearly-Zero-Error Sketching via Compressive Sensing
33mLearning the Best Agorithm for Max-Cut, Clustering, and Other Partitioning Problems
01h 11mStatistical Physics and Computation in High Dimension
49mGeneralized Cheeger Inequalities and Constrained Clustering
44mScalable Algorithmic Primitives for Data Science
29mSpectrally Robust Graph Isomorphism
01h 12mA Brief Introduction to Algorithms, Game Theory and Risk-Averse Decision Making
