The Tester's Role: Automator vs Manual Tester
summary
A panel discussion on tester roles contrasts automation engineers and manual testers, featuring participants from EPAM, Alteryx, DataArt, and Thomas Cook/Skelia and moderated by Svitla Systems. The panel examines whether separating roles is appropriate, what skills matter more for an automator (testing or programming), and whether one can reach senior-level pay without programming ability.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00Introduction
- 3:19Automator vs manual tester
- 8:08Business ignores specialists
- 16:24Specialists' role
- 23:25Manual vs automated testing
- 31:31Automation market impact
- 39:50Manual testing remains
- 48:15Industry bias and toxicity
- 55:51Automation for business value
- 1:00:32Outsourcing vs product companies
- 1:07:28When to switch jobs
related talks
43mWho should write automated tests?
15mThe Tester I Was and the Tester I Could Be
38mDo We Really Need A Test Automation Engineer?
46mTest automation tool Q&A panel
11mTechTalk "Automated Testing Inside the Team or as an External Service"
39mPanel Discussion | Mastering Test Automation: Strategies and Innovations
50mSOS: I'm a Manual Tester, I Need to Automate and I Don't Know Code
39mPanel Discussion: Future of Testing: Will Test Automation Put Manual Testing into the Shade?
