How We Lie to Ourselves With Charts
summary
Explains concrete failure modes: the hockey‑stick claim shows reconstructed estimates plus uncertainty, the 2016 map misleads because area ≠ voters so a cartogram or electoral‑vote bar fixes it, national crime lines hide city‑level outliers, and cigarette scatterplots produce an ecological fallacy — disaggregate, show uncertainty, and count actual people. Names seven cognitive traps — patternicity, narrative, confirmation, rationalization, fear of complexity, moral blindness — and demands specific fixes and ethics, not platitudes.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (28)
- 0:00Chart deception intro
- 1:02Data visualization reality
- 2:26Charts turn numbers to stories
- 5:16Hockey stick chart risks
- 7:05Charts in journalism
- 9:12Chart creators' duties
- 10:15Three chart myths debunked
- 11:39Charts as arguments
- 12:00Brain sees false patterns
- 14:07Randomness narratives danger
- 14:27Rural cancer rates myth
- 17:38Graphicacy and numeracy
- 19:01Misleading election map case
- 22:31Election maps by votes
- 24:40Averages hide complexity
- 27:29Fear of data complexity
- 28:33National averages lie
- 31:01Confirmation bias in charts
- 32:05Obamacare job chart fallacy
- 34:56Reasoning vs rationalization
- 36:20Smokers misread health charts
- 37:46Ecological fallacy & Simpson's paradox
- 39:32Ethics of sharing charts
- 41:00Books on critical thinking
- 42:43Charts build or destroy
- 43:46Verify shared charts
- 44:30Computation & journalism conf
- 45:14Q&A: Intentional vs accidental
related talks
51mThe Untruthful Art - Five Ways of Misrepresenting Data
40mHow to Lie With Stats and Charts
49mThe Untruthful Art - Five Ways of Misrepresenting Data
35mBad Charts
27mCharts and visual lies
56mThe Untruthful Art: Five ways of misrepresenting Data
51mEffective Data Visualization
11mData Visualization & Storytelling