Kubernetes Autoscaling: Beyond One Size Fits All
summary
Kubernetes clusters average about 20% efficiency, so horizontal scaling on CPU often thrashes; switching to queue depth cut costs roughly 5x in the demo. HPA v2 supports custom and external metrics but needs a Prometheus adapter; KEDA provides a prewired alternative with 50+ scalers and built‑in auth and the ability to scale to zero. Cluster autoscaling moves from Cluster Autoscaler to faster Carpenter; vertical autoscaling (VPA) sees ~1% adoption despite solving requests/limits pain.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction to autoscaling
- 1:03Autoscaling dimensions
- 2:58Horizontal Pod Autoscaler
- 7:52KEDA and custom metrics demo
- 21:36Cluster autoscaling
- 24:13Vertical scaling and conclusion
related talks
35mSIG Autoscaling Intro
51mHorizontal Autoscaling with Kubernetes
30mHorizontal Pod Autoscaler Reloaded - Scale on Custom Metrics
34mIntroduction to Autoscaling
17mScaling Made Simple: Implementing Autoscaling for Optimal K8s Performance
35mAutoscaling Kubernetes Deployments: A (Mostly) Practical Guide
35mIntro: SIG Autoscaling
24mSIG-Autoscaling: Introduction + HPA/VPA Updates
