~/talk

Shrinkage under random projections, and cubic formula lower bounds in AC^0

Talkat ITCS 2021 · 2021-01-06..01-08
links:none on file
name:Or Meir
links:none on file
links:none on file
slides:none on file

Proves an n^3 lower bound on De Morgan formula size for an explicit AC^0 function built by composing a small hard gadget F0 with a surjectivity block, using carefully designed random projections (not standard restrictions). Shows any formula shrinks by about the Korobchenko/adversary measure of G under these projections, so size(F∘G) ≥ size(F)·(adv(G))^2, recovering parity and giving a concrete AC^0 example where random-projection shrinkage works.

AI-written summary · about

  1. 0:00Intro
  2. 0:22Formula Size / Depth
  3. 1:47Motivation: Parallel Computation What is the power of Parallel Computation? Can we solve any problem a 1000 times faster with 1000 cores?
  4. 2:56Belief vs. Proof We believe that some problems in P require exponential formula size.
  5. 3:29Formula Size of Composition
  6. 6:59Andreev's construction
  7. 8:19Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Technique
  8. 11:08Candidate Problem
  9. 13:14The construction AC variant of Andreev's function
  10. 14:54An nº formula size lower bound for AC
  11. 18:21A bit about the techniques
~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.