Privacy & Anonymity may be ruining your Diversity and...
summary
Claims that diversity programs improve outcomes collide with design choices that erase privacy: benefits get advertised externally but internal guidance is absent, an HR ticket takes 72 hours and ten interactions and 10 people 60 days later to resolve, all-gender restrooms exist but code makes them optional, and a self-ID survey asks who do you know on your team? with numeric ranges that effectively out people. Concrete failures in process and survey wording undermine anonymity and depress self-identification.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (18)
- 0:00Intro
- 1:10Problem Statement
- 2:19What is Diversity
- 2:49What is inclusivity
- 3:31Privacy
- 4:23Selfidentification
- 6:07Definitions
- 6:19The Good
- 6:53WorldClass Benefits
- 7:48Trans Healthcare Benefits
- 9:29How do I use these benefits
- 10:07LGBTQ selfidentification survey
- 10:49Trans survey
- 11:25Who do you know
- 12:01Takeaways
- 13:01Transparency
- 13:39Safe
- 14:40Shoutouts
related talks
22mCreative Approaches To Diversity
44mThe Dark Side of D&I
50mDiversity, Equity, & Inclusion: The Paradoxical Effect & Impact on Security
01h 00mDX Design: Diversity Experience as an Accelerator
08mDiversity in Tech
11mHiring diverse teams with an anonymous recruitment process
01h 26mPanel - Diversity in Data Organizations: Building a Representative Workforce and Why it Matters
10mWe want to believe, but we don't
