Who do You Trust - Beware of Your Brain
summary
Claims there are no controlled balanced experiments comparing agile processes to alternatives and that most process decisions rest on anecdotes and persuasive stories. Argues agile might function like a placebo—teams feel better without measurable causal effect—and points out common interventions like team‑building in the woods often fail. Notes persistent stereotyping between development, test and business and urges measuring real outcomes instead of trusting feel‑good narratives.
AI-written summary · about
related talks
42mTrust or Bust - Product Manager Success in an Agile World
14mLightning Talks
58mOnce Upon a Time in Agile
21mInscribe Agile into Your Thinking! Agile Practices and Scientific Thinking
55mMisunderstanding
46mWho Do You Trust? Beware of Your Brain
33mEffective Agile Processes: It’s All About People
42mOnce Upon a Time in Agile
