Testing Intersectingness of Uniform Families or how Dana and I intersected
summary
Gives efficient algorithms that test whether a k‑uniform family over [n] is intersecting or ε‑far, including a tolerant tester and one‑sided non‑adaptive testers whose query complexity is optimal or optimal up to log factors. Surprising gap: whereas non‑uniform testing requires exp(√n) queries (Chen et al.), the uniform case needs poly(1/ε) (and occasional log n or log k factors) under thresholds like ε ≳ k^2/n. Proofs use the Dinur–Friedgut junta lemma, simple random pair sampling, counting lemmas and an r‑round “capture” refinement that guarantees finding disjoint pairs.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Introduction
- 4:21Early collaboration
- 9:49Intersectingness in uniform families
- 13:14New algorithm results
- 25:48Dana stories and tolerance
- 30:13Tess the dog
- 32:19Open problems and closing
related talks
30mParameterized Inapproximability of Max k-Subset Intersection under ETH
01h 01mExact Algorithms from FPT Algorithms
01h 02mFine-Grained Counting Complexity I
29mColor Coding-Related Techniques
01h 02mFine-Grained Counting Complexity II
29mSubexponential Parameterized Complexity of Completion Problems: Survey of the Upper Bounds
26mLower Bounds on the Running Time for Scheduling and Packing Problems
33mLower Bounds for Subexponential Parameterized Complexity of Minimum Fill-in and Related Problems
