The Law Bites Before the Code Does: Designing Vehicle...
summary
Predictive maintenance is technically solved but legally messy: design must answer three design questions before training — what data may be collected and how long retained, who may access diagnostic streams and back ends, and who is liable if an AI recommendation contributes to a fault. The U.S. has no comprehensive federal rule and about 20 states treat telematics as personal data; the FTC is enforcing Section 5 against OnStar and GM. Safety Act rules trigger recalls, manufacturers must self‑certify cyber, and best practices include isolate the modem from the CAN bus and segment automotive Ethernet; EU rules (GDPR, Cyber Resilience Act, AI Act) require ex‑ante opt‑in.
AI-written summary · about
related talks
28mDemystifying the emerging legal issues of AI
01h 11mAlgorithm Design and Law: Potential and Challenges
01h 21mThe Future is Now: Autonomous Vehicles, Trolley Problem(s) and How to Deal with Them.
53mAI: Law, Policy and Common Sense Suggestions on How to Stay Out of Trouble
01h 01mLegal and Compliance Insights on Open Source AI in Automotive
40mAI: Legal and Policy Considerations and Landmines to Avoid
17mAI Law & Ethics: developing responsible AI systems
01h 00mAI: Law, Policy, and Common Sense Suggestions to Stay Out of Trouble