sub0 Asia 2024 - Max Rebol and Mario Altenburger (Harbour Industrial)
summary
Explains why blockspace shifts from parachain auctions to agile core time change economics: compares locking 100 DOT for a 2‑year lease (18% staking -> ~40 DOT opportunity cost) versus paying 40 DOT upfront, argues burning core time sales creates predictable deflation and stabilizes treasuries, notes current activity: 17 projects supported and a crowd loan with ~400 contributors, anticipates third‑party marketplaces like Lastic marketplace, warns hoarding is futile, expects Kusama Q1 rollout and Polkadot timing unclear, and offers to act as a coretime broker.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (18)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:05Parachain auctions purpose
- 3:12Crowd loan strategies
- 5:00Agile Core Time model
- 6:05Agile Core Time economics
- 8:11Treasury vs burn for Core Time
- 10:46Treasury funding challenges
- 11:30Core Time allocation
- 12:57Core Time perishable commodity
- 13:41Core Time vs parachain auctions
- 14:22Crowd loans with Core Time
- 16:53Core Time rollout timeline
- 17:56Last parachain slots race
- 18:38Core Time branding loss
- 19:00Past fund projects
- 20:02Core Time brokerage model
- 20:46Block space as core resource
- 21:31Q&A
related talks
32mPolkadot Deep Dive: The Blockspace Ecosystem for Boundless Innovation
39mAuctions, and Crowdloans, and Slots, Oh My!
27mAn Introduction to Polkadot and Parachains
46mDecoding Polkadot’s DeFi Potential
37mATOM 2.0 Panel
22mThe On-chain Treasuries – Decentralized Community Funding
33mPanel - Rethinking Concepts: The Crypto Tide
23mMoonbeam: Boostrapping an Interoperable Ecosystem on Polkadot