Avoiding legal privacy and security snafus with big data and the IoT
summary
Hypothetical my life app ties phone, Apple Watch, connected home and car into one data stream and attracts the exact risks regulators are enforcing now: baby‑monitor and Jeep hacks, Asus router defaults, and the John Hancock FitBit program as examples. Regulators—led by the FTC—require security by Design, data minimization, clear notice and choice, data‑mapping and retention plans; over 100 privacy/security cases exist and penalties can reach $166,000 per record, with third‑party liability and subpoenas common.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (22)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:27The Universal Remote
- 2:10Consumer Concerns
- 3:45What could go wrong
- 3:55Apple vs FBI
- 4:57Other examples
- 6:18Jeep hack
- 7:39Getting to your legal obligations
- 9:45FTC
- 11:35FTC Recommendations
- 15:07Big Data
- 16:14Big Companies
- 17:00Data Collection
- 18:19Data Security
- 19:22Advertising
- 22:11John Hancock
- 24:08FTC Privacy and Security
- 25:24Privacy by Design
- 27:08Product Claims
- 28:43Product Privacy Security
- 29:34Transparency Consumer Choice
- 31:04Third Parties
related talks
36mPrivacy, Consent and Security Within Modern Applications
01h 27mTrans-atlantic discussions: Developing a sustainable 'Big Data' ecosystem ...
17mPrivacy Design Flaws
01h 03mPanel: The security paradox. Individual privacy vs digital driftnets
19mSecurity and Privacy in a Hyper-connected World
01h 02mWeaponizing Technology: Examining the Importance of Privacy...
01h 07mSECURING PERSONAL DATA: THE “NEW” NORMAL
48mSecuring The Internet Of Things
