~/talk

Are We Really Engineers?

slides:none on file

Interviews with 17 crossovers (12 hours total) probe whether software counts as engineering and report 15 of 17 say yes, with nuance: software’s key differences are iteration speed, reliance on discrete math, and high consistency, while traditional fields face physical inconsistency and regulatory rigor. Concrete examples include Boeing 737 Max software-stabilizer tradeoffs, moving bridges, and tiny “snap fit” design books. A repeated takeaway: other engineers crave version control and practitioner-style openness.

AI-written summary · about

  1. 0:00Intro
  2. 3:48Methodology
  3. 5:14Whats Engineering
  4. 6:19Is Engineering Physical
  5. 8:49Is Engineering consequential
  6. 10:43Is Engineering licensed
  7. 15:57Software vs Traditional Engineering
  8. 18:08Engineering is predictable
  9. 22:48Engineering is more rigorous
  10. 26:16Whats different
  11. 28:16Consistency
  12. 30:24Are we special
  13. 33:10What can we learn
  14. 34:49Version Control
  15. 36:14Final Thoughts
~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.