Not All Benchmarks Are Created Equal
summary
A survey argues that benchmarking needs variety and clarity: a 1,500-source bibliography catalogs methods, testbeds run at 5–50 qubits, and many benchmarks probe different properties rather than a single “goodness” number. Tools compared include state tomography, randomized benchmarking and direct RB scales to ~10 qubits, Google’s random-circuit sampling/Cross-Entropy on ~53 qubits, IBM’s quantum volume and a proposed volumetric benchmarks framework; experiments show circuit structure and compilation change outcomes and efficiently verifiable circuits are needed next.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (15)
- 0:00Start
- 11:25Characterization Questions
- 21:49Future Digital Quantum Computers
- 22:09Analog Simulators
- 25:34General Guidelines
- 31:58Characterizing Elementary Operations
- 41:38Direct Randomized Benchmarking
- 44:50The Significance of Using Clifford Circuits
- 45:19Why Do You Use Clifford Circuits
- 46:59Quantum Supremacy
- 49:55Quantum Volume
- 52:46Random Circuit Sampling
- 54:15Volumetric Benchmarks
- 56:56Conclusion
- 58:47Protocols for Holistic Benchmarking
