Interview with Elizabeth Denham
summary
Argues data governance shifts from minimal compliance to strategic asset management, citing laws such as EU AI Act and emerging US state statutes that require provable accountability. Calls for a renaissance of the privacy profession to close a clear skills gap, broaden expertise into economic and societal impacts, and manage AI secondary uses. Priorities include building practical compliance programs, strengthening small regulators (Jersey DPA mentioned), and centering children's privacy and online harms.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction
- 2:26What are the main challenges with data governance in the years to come?
- 3:54How important are international dialogue and cooperation for data governance?
- 5:34Why are conferences such as the Privacy Symposium important?
- 6:50What is your priority objective and vision for the year to come?
- 8:01Any messages you would like to share?
related talks
01h 19mAligning Data Privacy and AI Governance
01h 11mTransforming GDPR into a Risk Based Harm Tool Alongside Specific AI Regulation...
06mInterview with Neema Guliani
30mKeeping Pace With The Changing Regulatory Landscape: UK & EU Updates
01h 14mLessons from the GDPR Red Lines or Red Tape
01h 11mBack to Basics How Data Protection Principles Apply to AI Systems
32mPanel: How can Data Protection become a driver for the Data Economy
01h 14mLatest Developments in AI and Data Protection Legal Uncertainty Despite