Panel Discussion: OSPO Panel of Japan
summary
Japanese companies report concrete OSPO setups: Toyota and others create governance inside IP and security with KPIs like OSS release requests and license policy violations; Mercari runs a PR-based publication flow on GitHub with IP and security review, CI-integrated scanning and a whitelist policy that drove zero policy violations; Fujitsu emphasizes mission‑critical OSS, client support and the struggle to hire IP experts; Sony shifts from embedded Linux compliance to active upstream contribution.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (11)
- 0:00OSPO panel in Japan
- 4:47OSPOs in Japanese companies
- 12:32Mercari’s OSPO practices
- 16:57Sony’s OSPO journey
- 20:37Challenges in OSPO establishment
- 26:49Engineer engagement at Mercari
- 28:43KPIs for OSPO success
- 32:34Standardizing OSPO metrics
- 35:05OSPO goals versus regulations
- 35:50Preventing open source misuse
- 37:59Open Chain’s OSPO role
related talks
30mOSS Sustainability...
41mPanel: Expanding Japan's OSPO Ecosystem...
36mOSPO Issues in a Conglomerate Company
41mThe OSPO Panel of JAPAN 2023: How to Accelerate OSPO?
43mThe Automotive OSPO
43mPanel Discussion: The Automotive OSPO
39mOSPOs in Energy, Transport, Automotive & Public Sector
45mPanel Discussion: Bring Your Product Manager to the Open Source Party
