When there is no alternative to InnerSource
summary
InnerSource creates bidirectional, high-frequency code flows across country and business boundaries, so a commit every few hours triggers tax and IP valuation issues; the claim is that existing one-way transfer‑pricing models fail. The team builds an accounting framework that values commits by labor‑cost base price per commit and then allocates reimbursements via a usage‑and-contribution split using empirical engineering BI (commit logs, contribution counts, outcome metrics). Prototype models are under pilot with German tax authorities and multinational clients, not yet a finished turnkey product.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (5)
- 0:00Introduction to InnerSource
- 3:56Business boundaries in InnerSource
- 7:30Transfer pricing challenges
- 12:34Solving transfer pricing with accounting models
- 14:44Summary and Q&A
related talks
19mWhen there is no alternative to InnerSource
17mBuilding InnerSource Foundations Through InnerSource Patterns
46mOpen Source, InnerSource - Similarities, Differences, Connections
28mBreaking Silos With InnerSource
18m(Y)Our Journey to Inner Source
16mThe InnerSource Laundry List
47mWhat Is InnerSource? How Do You Implement It ...
47mHow Should Your OSPO Work with InnerSource?