Accessing Answers to Unions of Conjunctive Queries with Ideal Time Guarantees: II
summary
Acyclic conjunctive queries that are free-connex admit linear preprocessing and constant-delay enumeration, while acyclic but not free-connex queries are hard under Boolean matrix multiplication reductions because projections force duplicate-elimination across many explanations. Unions can flip hardness: a body-homomorphism from one CQ to another lets one CQ precompute the hard join, Cheater’s Lemma bounds tolerated duplicate output, and classifying unions of two CQs requires reductions to vertex-unbalanced triangle detection; beyond two queries remains open.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:07Conjunctive queries with existential vars
- 3:33Free-connex acyclic queries
- 4:40Hardness of acyclic non-free-connex
- 6:54Unions of conjunctive queries
- 7:59Complexity of mixed-easy unions
- 9:02Hard queries and matrix multiplication
- 12:40Unions of hard queries becoming easy
- 15:31Open problems
- 17:15Conclusion
related talks
29mDirect Access for Conjunctive Queries with Aggregation
53mDirect Access for Conjunctive Queries with Negation
38mThe Intensional-Extensional Problem in Probabilistic Databases
01h 05mIncremental View Maintenance 2
21mRecent Advances in Incremental View Maintenance
28mA Dichotomy Structure Theorem for the Resilience Problem
35mApproximating Certain and Possible Answers Beyond Sets
01h 05mQuery Optimization and Evaluation 2: Worst-Case Optimal Join Algorithms
