Consequences of SETH: Tight Bounds for Some More Problems
summary
Examines implications of the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) for getting tight time lower bounds on several computational problems; identifies specific problems for which SETH implies no faster algorithms than known, and explains the reductions or conditional comparisons used to derive those tight bounds.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (23)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:24Tight lower bounds
- 2:00Strong ETH
- 3:00Showing Lower Bounds under SETH
- 5:43SAT → k-Dominating Set Variables
- 8:45SAT → k-Dominating Set analysis
- 11:00Dominating Set, wrapping up
- 15:38Independent Sets on an Even Path
- 17:14d-SAT S Independent Set proof by example
- 18:11Independent Sets - Assignments
- 19:33Dealing with true false
- 21:07Treewidth Bound by picture
- 22:45Independent Set / Treewidth wrap up
- 24:123t lower bound for Dominating Set?
- 26:56Hitting Set/n
- 31:52Some deep math
- 33:36d-SAT Hitting Set Group the variables into groups of size g, and set
- 35:05Forcing solution [1/2] vertices in a group?
- 36:11Analyzing a group
- 38:11Forbidding partial assignments
- 39:58Satisfying Assignments Hitting Sets
- 41:12Important Open Problems
- 46:48Conclusions
