The ins and outs of evaluating engineers
summary
Box restructures teams into vertical, autonomous units and launches an internal hiring program called 10x staff with manager sourcing quotas tied to performance; recruiting leans on Triplebyte and Karat. Experiments find the same candidate gets conflicting hire/no-hire recommendations, so hiring moves to project-based intern assessments and mandated, data-driven explicit rubrics for interviews. Companies pilot standalone leadership interviews, favor optional take-home projects, and conclude algorithm-only screens are increasingly overrated compared with role-aligned, measured evaluations.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (9)
- 0:00Introduction
- 3:20How does the hiring process change
- 7:47Hiring for the long term
- 11:00Be rooted in reality
- 12:35Who should you hire
- 16:43Diversity
- 18:22Evaluation
- 25:31Underrated
- 27:20Conclusion
related talks
01h 02mHow to hire great engineers
49mFinding potential in your interview processes
35mLessons Learned—Data Driven Hiring 3 Years Later
24mSo You Want To Hire for Platform Engineering?
26mSo you want to hire engineering force multipliers?
41mThe Changing Face of Engineering What Teams Need Now 002
58mBuilding Great Teams
34mDesigning an engineering team: Making room for everyone