Locknote: Conclusions and Key Takeaways from Day 2
summary
Panel summarizes concrete tensions: industry incentives beat ideal fixes, so companies choose analytics-friendly choices like certificate transparency over stronger options like DANE or certificate pinning; decentralised projects such as Mastodon / ActivityPub exist for five years but only scale after Twitter crises, and they work functionally yet lack monetisation and algorithmic discovery; running community services (Tor nodes, remailers, home servers on Raspberry Pi) still helps but demands upkeep; policy levers (GDPR, RPKI control points) and targeted POCs influence change more than public finger‑pointing.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Closing session intro
- 1:07Board members introduce themselves
- 2:31Engaging policy makers for internet safety
- 6:24Security: individual vs industry
- 9:18Security incentives and nudging
- 13:09Community vs industry in cybersecurity
- 17:46Generalists vs specialists in tech
- 21:20Centralization vs decentralization
- 25:37Future of decentralization
- 30:28Audience contributions
related talks
01h 02mClosing Keynote Day 1
48mConclusions and Key Takeaways from Day 2
41mLocknote: Conclusions and Key Takeaways from Day 1
44mLocknote: Conclusions and Key Takeaways From Black Hat Europe 2017
48mConclusions and Key Takeaways from Day 1
56mPanel Discussion: Secure Our Future.
41mLocknote: Conclusions and Key Takeaways from Day 1 locknote
15mClosing remarks for day 2