~/talk

Learning Preferences with Latent State

links:none on file
slides:none on file

Claims that preferences are recoverable when the human uses an unknown finite-state machine, gives a concrete estimator and proofs of consistency. Method fits TD-parameterized utilities by MLE while scoring models with prequential scoring, searches growing state-space classes, and shows convergence to a minimal machine that reproduces choice probabilities. Empirical test is a parity example (sequence length 10) where the two-state true model is recovered with little data. Assumptions: finite observations, IID choice pairs, logit noise; rare-history pathologies and model-class tuning remain open.

AI-written summary · about

  1. 0:00Introduction
  2. 1:04Latent state in alignment
  3. 7:21Preference recovery formalized
  4. 18:21Parity machine example
  5. 28:37Algorithm for preferences
  6. 35:07Theoretical guarantees
  7. 39:03Challenges and limitations
  8. 43:18Broader implications
  9. 45:27Q&A
~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.