The Computational Benefit of Correlated Instances
summary
Defines a model where hard CSP instances come with extra correlated instances produced by small perturbations of the hidden solution, and studies two correlation types including the known-difference model. Main claims: for random CSPs, O(log n) correlated perturbed instances suffice to recover a solution that matches almost all constraints; with the differences revealed one can recover the exact solution for worst-case instances using shift encoding plus linear-algebraic decoding; without differences the problem reduces to solving noisy linear equations (LPN-like), requiring more elaborate voting and spectral methods.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (14)
- 0:00My Berkeley Days 1979-1982
- 4:22What to Talk About?
- 5:50The Algorithmic Benefit of Correlated Instances
- 7:02Example: factoring integers
- 8:33Correlated instances as a phenomenon
- 10:07Model for correlated instances
- 12:39Focus: Constraint satisfaction problems (CSP)
- 15:03Correlated instances of CSPS
- 18:02Random CSP: Correlated Instances Help: from Intractable to Tractable Theorem 1 (random CSP)
- 18:46Worst Case CSP: Correlated Instance + Known Differences
- 20:27Special Predicates, Two Instances Enough
- 24:14Details - solving from many instances (Thm 1) not given the differences
- 25:45Further results and questions 1. Did correlation only help because CSP is easy? No, PCP instances that succumb to correlation 2. Does Correlation Always Help? No and Yes
- 28:58Why and when is collaboration beneficial?
related talks
10mQuery, Communication and Discrepancy
26mPCPs and Instance Compression from a Cryptographic Lens
01h 03mSecure Computation 2
31mCryptographic Hardness of Correlated Sampling
01h 07mSomething about new average-case hard problems?
29mImproved Deterministic Algorithms for Sparse Max-SAT
24mCorrelation detection in trees for planted graph alignment
01h 02mConditional Hardness for Massively Parallel Computing (MPC) Via Distributed Lower Bounds
