Status quo eIDAS - Germany in the 6th year of the eIDAS Regulation
summary
Germany has 12 providers offering nearly all eIDAS trust services but no qualified preservation service provider; users can pick among four remote signature providers and two registered‑delivery vendors (one De‑Mail). The market faces growing EU and non‑EU competition, COVID‑driven demand, and slow implementation—electronic seals are seldom used in legal contexts, qualified website certificates could have prevented North Rhine‑Westphalia web‑trust problems, and urgent needs include richer attributes for business use, harmonised technical standards, and the Optimus project to enable mobile secure elements.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (12)
- 0:00Start
- 1:576th year of the eIDAS Regulation
- 3:24The German offering
- 5:17In European comparison
- 6:13European competition in Germany
- 8:34Digital signing booms due to Corona
- 9:26Use in national legislation
- 10:26Recommendation for uniform standards
- 10:58eIDAS tools aid digitalization
- 12:45Position paper on short-term goals and potential of the eIDAS Regulation
- 22:55Status quo eIDAS – Germany in the 6th year of the eIDAS Regulation
- 32:32Thanks to our partners
related talks
13mA Focus on Digital Sovereignty: Trust Services and Sovereign Cloud
01mOfficial Teaser
20mHow to: Pushing eHealth interoperability in Germany
31mPolitics matter - from techready to techsavvy
48mKeynote: Digital Society "e-Estonia"
40mShaping the European Business Wallet: Industry, Standardisation and Policy Perspectives
17mImpact of eIDAS 2.0 on Healthcare
13meIDAS, EUDI-Wallet, European Business Wallet? An Overview of the European Framework