AI Regulation Update: Getting Ahead of New US State Laws
summary
State AI laws are already specific: Texas defines AI broadly but limits enforcement to intent-based prohibitions, Colorado imposes all ten compliance categories (assessments, mitigation, security, governance) and flags high‑risk systems in housing/healthcare, California and New York target frontier models with a 10^26 FLOPs and $500M+ revenue threshold, they require transparency and incident reporting for $1B catastrophic loss or 50+ injuries, companion chatbots must warn minors every three hours, NYC hiring tools need annual independent audits and candidate notice, and NIST guidance is cited for technical standards.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00AI regulation session
- 1:06AI regulatory landscape
- 2:07Federal role in AI regulation
- 9:14Top 10 AI law requirements
- 15:18Texas and Colorado AI laws
- 19:08Frontier model transparency
- 22:43Chatbot companion laws in California and New York
- 24:31Labor and employment AI
- 26:37Deepfakes and disclosures
- 28:05Healthcare AI regulations
related talks
40mAI: Legal and Policy Considerations and Landmines to Avoid
36mResponsible AI: In Theory, Practice, and Policies
30mAI Regulation - How to implement AI legally compliant?
01h 19mPower, Convenience, and Prestige in the Governance and Legal Regulation of AI
31mPanel: Navigating the AI Policy Landscape
28mAI Act - What is important to know from a developers perspective?
01h 10mGlobal Approaches to AI Regulation Towards an International Law on AI
58mUsing AI in games