Why you should want to contribute to the Haskell Ecosystem
summary
Contributions that connect to the ecosystem matter: a one-weekend implementation of late cost‑centre profiling then takes weeks of fixes and outreach and actually makes profiling usable; 300-line bash script for the installer becomes a proper tool after ~3 months of work and now many CI jobs depend on it; backpack shows huge effort with poor uptake; funding Hackage upgrade and HLS Open Collective payments cover real infrastructure costs; filing tickets with a reproducer in bug reports speeds fixes.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (14)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:11Software ecosystem
- 3:17Improvements scale with connections
- 5:45Effort does not guarantee impact
- 8:13Contributions fail and succeed
- 13:34Obvious ways to improve
- 14:36Documentation as force multiplier
- 16:03Tickets as low-effort communication
- 21:06Funding contributions
- 25:59Communities' role
- 27:04Barriers to contributing
- 30:16Proposal processes in Haskell
- 35:15Improving collaboration
- 37:40Q&A
related talks
54mHaskell Project Showcase and Community Contributions
01h 11mHaskell in Industry: Expert Panel on Tooling, Teaching & Real-World Use
47mIndustrial Strength Laziness: What's Next?
03mInterview
14mImpressions of ZuriHac, and Why We Love (and Hate) Haskell
01h 22mGetting Up and Running, and Contributing to GHC
01h 26mReflections on Haskell@Meta
53mFalling Skies: Haskell Tooling and Ecosystem Growth